FI4R Diaries Round II Insights: How Refugees Perceive and Cope with Risk

By The Financial Inclusion for Refugees (FI4R) team

    Download Case Study

    This is part two of an ongoing series of insights from a financial diaries study undertaken with refugees in Uganda, focused on their ability to cope with risks. The respondents are drawn from customers served by three financial service providers: Equity Bank Uganda, VisionFund Uganda, and the Rural Finance Initiative.

    Refugees rely on cash transfers and income to pay for their expenses and save for future needs. Like other low-income people, refugees have limited capacity to cope with unexpected events and sometimes experience major setbacks when hit by seemingly small shocks that disrupt cash flows. The most common and impactful shocks are health related. Even relatively moderate health shocks typically have a significant economic impact as refugees are often ill-prepared to manage financial shocks in general.

    Most refugee settlements in Uganda provide free healthcare to residents, but it is often inadequate, especially for cases that require specialised care.

    Our community hospital has become empty of drugs, in most cases when we go there, medicine is not there and we end up spending a lot of money to buy from drug shops, yet money is very scarce in the refugee community,” said Lilian.

    With few formal financial resources and tools at their disposal, refugees often have to turn to alternative risk management strategies to manage such events. To better understand how refugees manage their income and expenses, FSD Uganda, FSD Africa and BFA Global have been conducting financial diaries with 48 refugee households in Uganda since August 2020. This second round of diaries explores how refugees perceive, plan for, experience, and cope with risks and shocks in their lives through a risk-related survey. The information collected provides powerful insights on perceived and actual risks that threaten to disrupt the lives of refugees. We sought to build evidence on existing gaps and opportunities in risk mitigation mechanisms and coping strategies available for refugees to help inform and catalyse the development of fit-for-purpose solutions that effectively help refugees address risk in their day-to-day lives.

    Perception of risk
    To learn about potential risks faced by these communities, we asked refugee households about the likelihood of specific events occurring, the costs associated with them, and how they would manage each risk. Figure 1 below visualises the perceived likelihood of these events occurring.

    Two of the top three events considered most likely to occur were health-related,with the expectation of food price increases being the leading risk event. Food price hikes became a major concern after the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) reduced food rations by up to 40% to over 1.2 million refugees in Uganda due to funding shortfalls. As a result, refugee households have had to buy food to supplement the aid they were receiving. Food prices also went up around the period of the COVID-19 related lockdown.

    Hospitalisation was the second-highest concern among refugees. 43% of respondents confirmed that they had been hospitalised, with 19 households experiencing a hospitalisation incident within the past five years. The median cost of hospitalisation incidents is $26 – representing about 68% of the median household income. Despite anticipating such risk events, respondents feel that they are unprepared to manage them effectively should they occur.

    Coping with risk
    Refugee households feel very unprepared for most kinds of risks, especially because of their unpredictable and volatile incomes. Only a few have investments or money saved up that could help with managing risks. Most household income is committed to providing basic needs, like food, often leaving a thin safety net for the family to deal with exigencies of all kinds. Coping mechanisms often employed include borrowing from social networks – primarily family and friends, and relying on contributions. Social networks and well wishers are especially sought in dire circumstances, such as illnesses or death. On occasion, social networks do not provide the much-needed relief, provide it too late, or the pooled contributions might be too small to cover the cost of the event.

    Figure 2 below shows how prepared respondents feel they are to face potential risks.

    The households we interviewed depend either on aid from development agencies or the little they have saved up at home, to meet their needs. A few borrow from savings groups – Accumulating Savings and Credit Associations (ASCAs) – or sell their assets when all other avenues have been exhausted. Given the limitations of current coping mechanisms, refugees need quicker and more reliable solutions that can help them mitigate risk.

    Mitigating risks
    There is an opportunity for financial service providers to design, market, and distribute relevant financial risk management tools to refugees, including insurance, savings, and credit products. Insurance is critical to enable refugees to manage significant events, including hospitalisation or death of the main income earner. There is an opportunity to bundle insurance with group savings products or even with cash transfers, to create sufficient awareness of the value of formal insurance among refugees. Financial service providers also need to build financial literacy into their product offering and communicate terms and conditions clearly, to avoid exposing refugees to additional vulnerabilities.

    Financial service providers should also consider offering short-term mobile loans as an alternative to current options that often have alarming interest rates, ranging from 22% to 30%. The loans would help refugees address shocks quickly when the need arises. Evidence from our ongoing financial interventions within West Nile refugee settlements attest to the responsible financial behaviour of refugees, particularly when it comes to timely repayment of their loans. Financial service providers can further determine the creditworthiness and lending limits for refugees through mobile phone utilisation records. Our baseline research in four settlements shows that 74% of refugees own or have access to a cell phone.

    Previous research in the Kenya Financial diaries report proposes a risk management solution that combines savings and insurance products to provide a clean lump sum upon the occurrence of a verifiable trigger event. Such an option could boost existing savings and help families navigate through a difficult time. Another solution could be remittance services linked to insurance. A product that is distributed through remittance service providers, and which gives remittance senders an opportunity to purchase an insurance product for funds recipients can reduce the financial burden on them when recipients experience a shock that requires financial support.

    From the research, it is evident that refugees have limited capacity to cope with major setbacks and feel unprepared to deal with several shocks when they occur. With gaps in existing risk mitigation approaches, there is a clear need for more robust financial products and services that can help reduce the vulnerability of refugees to shocks and help them cope with unexpected events. In the wake of a global pandemic that has disrupted the norms refugees relied on to manage unexpected events, new approaches that enable refugees to cope with and recover from unexpected events will be key to securing their livelihoods and enabling them to rebuild their lives.

    Read more insights from the diaries research here. Stay tuned in the months ahead for the results of the next rounds of diaries.

    Related Articles